The “Life of Riley” Gets Tough. Again.

It’s been nearly two years since I saw my imaginary friend Riley.

Usually a gregarious type, he’s best known for living “The Life of Riley” – an easy life, unsullied by regular work or obligations. Were he in Ireland, he could be found at his traditional haunt, the local pub. He’d be drinking Guiness and happily massaging bloody knuckles.

But my imaginary Riley lives in Texas. He drinks margaritas. His scent is “Eau de BBQ.”  Regular readers will recall that he doesn’t just avoid work. He eschews it. He can do this because he has investments and lives on investment income. Unlike the Ridiculously Rich, who get all the press attention, Texas Riley decided years ago that he just wanted to be “comfortable.” He spends accordingly.

Just More Income Than Most

That means no mega-yacht, for him.  He’s fine with an aging bass boat. Indeed, his goal  — defined with algebraic purity — is to have more income than most people. But not so much that anyone would be interested in what he does.  Day or night.

He defines this as more income than 75 percent of all workers.

Sounds easy, right?

But it isn’t.

As I’ve demonstrated since 1985, to live the Life of Riley you need a particular income. But the income yield produced by your investments varies from year to year. So there are years when it is easy to retire from the world of labor. And there are years when it’s hard because you need a lot of investment money to start.

Here’s an example. Back in 1985, the S&P 500 provided a yield of 4.25 percent. (I’m not kidding!) A five-year Treasury earned 10.12 percent. (I’m not kidding about that, either!) A simple 50/50 Couch Potato portfolio provided a whopping yield of 7.19 percent.

Imagine that.

Better still, the required income was only $30,928. So any aspirant Riley could live the Life of Riley with an investment portfolio of $430,452.

Thirty-five years later, in 2020, investment yields had turned into a piddle – 1.95 percent for the S&P 500 and a mere 0.31 percent for the five-year Treasury. So providing the required $87,529 in income required a portfolio of $7.7 million (see chart below).

Yes, $7.7 million. That’s quite a difference. Instead of needing to be merely “mass-affluent,” you had to be genuinely rich.

Living the Life of Riley Gets Tough… Again

 So far, the rise off the 2023 bottom has been modest. But a careful examination of the tea leaves suggests that rising inflation will require a higher income. That usually means a larger starting portfolio.

You should also know that the tea leaves have been confirmed by both the goat entrails and the cow patties — tools that have been at least as accurate as predictions by Wall Street, professional economists and the National Association of Slot Machine Players.

If fewer will be able to choose living the Life of Riley in the future, the usual suspects are likely to be the cause: rising federal spending and deficits, a declining dollar, less Treasury buying by other nations, and reduced home building. As I said, the usual suspects.

Can we protect ourselves?

 My Life of Riley has been a tongue-in-cheek exercise for decades, but the numbers were serious. Indeed, earlier editions also featured an adjustment for Social Security income, since retirees could reduce the portfolio figure by 25 to 40 percent, depending on their lifetime earnings, marital status and earnings of their spouse if they were married.

But our elected representatives have done nothing to defer or avoid the projected need to cut Social Security benefits year after year. Now the crisis is projected for 2032, barely an eye blink away.

This worsens the likely future for just about everyone.  Young and old. Professionals and blue collars. Private and public sector workers. Corporate workers and small company workers.

It is only irrelevant to the very rich.

This is not a left-wing statement. It is what the numbers say.


Related columns:

Scott Burns, “My Dinner With Riley,” September 8, 2024: https://scottburns.com/my-dinner-with-riley/

Scott Burns, “The Life of Riley Gets Even Easier,” June 17, 2023: https://scottburns.com/the-life-of-riley-gets-even-easier/

Scott Burns, “The Life of Riley, Now on Sale, July 30, 2022: https://scottburns.com/rising-yields-mean-you-need-less-investment-money-to-live-pretty-well/

Scott Burns, “Affording the Life of Riley, 2021: June 11, 2021: https://scottburns.com/affording-the-life-of-riley-2021/

Scott Burns, “Covid Blew Up the Life of Riley Index,” July 4, 2020: https://scottburns.com/covid-19-blew-up-the-life-of-riley-index/

Scott Burns, “Living the Good Life, Along with Riley, September 7, 2019: https://scottburns.com/living-the-good-life-along-with-riley/


Sources and References:

BLS.gov inflation calculator: https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm

IRS.gov Statistics of Income: https://www.irs.gov/statistics/soi-tax-stats-individual-statistical-tables-by-tax-rate-and-income-percentile

U.S. Treasury Daily Treasury Par Yield Curve Rates: https://home.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/TextView?type=daily_treasury_yield_curve&field_tdr_date_value=202608

Rachel Louise Ensign, “More Americans Are Breaking Into the Upper Middle Class,” 4/4/2026: https://www.wsj.com/economy/more-americans-are-breaking-into-the-upper-middle-class-bf8b7cb2

Stephen J. Rose, Scott Winship, “The Middle Class Is Shrinking Because of a Booming Upper-Middle Class,” 1/6/2026: https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/the-middle-class-is-shrinking-because-of-a-booming-upper-middle-class/


This information is distributed for education purposes, and it is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation, recommendation, or endorsement of any particular security, product, or service.


Photo: Scott Burns, Maryland Marina scene, 7/2022

(c) Scott Burns, 2026

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.